Patrice Riemens on Thu, 6 Sep 2001 18:58:17 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> Pierre Khalfa (ATTAC-France) on violence & the movement after Genoa |
After Genoa, there is a lot of discussion going on within and about the future of 'the movement', quite some, but not all of which is very helpful. In my opinion, Pierre Khalfa's contribution belongs to the former rather than to the latter category, and that is the reason why I forwarded it. I would strongly disagree with Nik on his appreciation that the train of 'the movement' is now being boarded while moving on all sides by hordes of fellow (and apparently 'ticketless') travellers. The opposition against what is now termed corporate globalisation has a long history (Oxfam, for instance was founded just after the war. Its brief has not changed very much since) What is true however, and what probably prompts him to dubb the more 'institutionalised' parts of 'the movement' as Johny-comes-latelies, is that there has been a break in activism somewhere in the late eighties - early nineties, when a lot of people in the so-called (then) Third World movement moved onto well paid NGO jobs where they could lobby for 'development' in more confortable surroundings (hey, we have a mortgage and a family to sustain!) and have since not been seen in the streets, especially not when the police goes on rampage. That some of these very same people now blame 'the violence' on assorted Black Bloc, anarchists etc. is of course most unhelpful, but should not distract from the need to have an as broad as possible alliance of forces to oppose corporate globalisation. And I think that is the positive lesson from Genoa. An other world is possible, even if it is a long road. _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold