mihnea mircan on Sat, 6 Sep 2008 15:07:17 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-ro] 'Since we last spoke about monuments' at Stroom Den Haag |
http://stroom.nl/activiteiten/tentoonstelling.php?t_id=5419609 SINCE WE LAST SPOKE ABOUT MONUMENTS Artists: Azra Aksamija, Matthew Buckingham, Sam Durant, Office KGDVS, Hans van Houwelingen, Irwin, Alon Levin, Metahaven, Ciprian Muresan, Tom Nicholson, Jonas Staal & Vincent van Gerven Oei, Mona Vatamanu & Florin Tudor. Curator: Mihnea Mircan 14 September - 9 November 2008 Opening: Saturday 13 September, 5 pm Introductory talk: Azra Aksamija, Mihnea Mircan, Tom Nicholson, Gon Zifroni (Metahaven)/ 4 pm ‘Since we last spoke about monuments’ is a look at recent history from a perspective generally reserved to absolute views of the past – that of monuments –, rather than to its interrogation. The exhibition assembles critical standpoints on the relation between monumentality and our usages of memory, our ideological unrest. It examines contradictions inbuilt in monuments, contradictory uses of monuments, as well as the possibility of a monument that integrates contradiction: dissent, diverging purposes, imagination. It aims to visualize a complicated monument for a complicated state of affairs – political, social or cultural. The exhibition stems from a desire to disrupt the symbolic apparatus of monuments. Directly or obliquely, the works on show question the political and cultural mechanisms that monuments rely on, their necessity and legitimacy, their address and the communal epiphanies they stand for. Throughout the exhibition, the word ‘monument’ is used as instrument of questionable truth-value, as oscillation: between obsolescence and possible reinvention, between communities as ideologies imagine them and other, subtler forms of communality, between historical distortions and new ways of making history, between the ravages of populism and political protest, or counter-sovereignty as represented in contemporary art. The ‘monument’ has less to do with bronze or stone than with the victories, gaps or losses that deserve, today, monumental sites of public negotiation. Fervent debates the world over about what to remember – where, how, and to whose benefit –, public works commissioned, defaced or deplored, countless instances of symbolic abuse in public space evince the extent to which monuments are still with us today, as screens for projecting political or social emergencies, for enacting cultural memory. Archives, performances, an earthquake, the perfect paradox of a monument to control or a Panopticon looking unto itself, borders and repossessed territory, an untenable claim and conflicting images of eternity – the projects and positions in the exhibition reassert the artistic possibility of the monument, away from fabricated narratives, the deformities of political propaganda or collective Freudian slips. _______________________________________________ Nettime-ro mailing list Nettime-ro@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-ro --> arhiva: http://amsterdam.nettime.org/