Noah Brehmer on Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:56:47 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Call for support from Lithuania |
Four people in Kaunas are now being ridiculously prosecuted by criminal charges for inciting violence against social and ethnic groups by putting posters that said “BURN DETENTION CENTRES DEPORT THE GOVERNMENT IMMIGRANTS WELCOME” (In Lithuanian: “SUDEGINK RUKLĄ DEPORTUOK VYRIAUSYBĘ IMIGRANTAI WELCOME”. The absurd accusations are based on total misinterpretation of poster but it cannot be explained without taking into consideration the current regional context of militarisation and “the enemies of the state” hunt driven by the discourse of “national security”. We are calling for support from all around Europe and beyond to help win the case and to show that not people but detention centres build up by governments need to be deported. The posters were hung on the eve of February 16 last year, before the Statehood Restoration Day, commemorated by right-wing march on Kaunas streets <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELuEZqDp0Nc>. It was caught on camera and the official police investigation began. Also, it is probable, then, that the investigation is being pushed by the right-wing group(s) interest in revenge and silencing their direct opposition. The accusations are based on an (incredibly) incompetent interpretation of the poster according to which: “burn Rukla (the “integration” centre)”, rather than being a critique of an insufficient, faulty, and, essentially, harmful institution, is an incitement to burn the “integration” centre together with its inhabitants. “Deport the government”, rather than being a critique of government largely blind to the issues that asylum seekers experience every day (as in “walk a mile in their shoes”), is an incitement of violence towards “a group of persons… belonging thereto on grounds of… social status” (i.e. “government” being understood as “social group”) There is also a secondary interpretation, played completely on the recent Russian scare. According to it, “burn Rukla” may mean incitement to destroy the Lithuanian military regiment stationed in Rukla, “deport the government” may mean incitement to overthrow the government of the Republic of Lithuania, and “immigrants welcome” may mean welcoming of the Russian “immigrants”, i.e., occupational forces. Needless to say, such an interpretation plays a part in making the case part of the defensive nationalist ideology. Two homes were raided by the criminal police in order to search for evidence that the persons living in them participated in the action. No such evidence was found. To one of the accused, a student that was at the time working and at the moment is unemployed, the option of state lawyer was denied, because the universal right to free-of-charge state lawyer was abolished as one of the austerity measures employed by the Lithuanian state in 2009. After the pre-court procedure was deemed over, the pleas of the accused to provide an alternative interpretation of the poster’s text was rejected due to supposed “unwillingness to cooperate with the police”. While this case may appear as small in light of the terrible social and legal situation of the refugees – to whom the action was in solidarity with – we believe it is part of a broader picture of militarisation, criminalisation of protest, and support to far-right politics in Lithuania. Since Lithuania joined the EU in 2004 there has been a movement toward the centralization and exponential expansion of security and military forces – this expansion has been rapidly increased in the context of post-euro maidan geo-politics. The re-introduction of mandatory conscription (2015; previously abolished in 2008), the formation of a para-military riot control squad (2008), the arming of police with assault rifles (2015), acquisition of water cannons to control future protests (2016), the theatrical public performance of a military response to a building occupied by armed “dissenters” (2015), a mandatory nation-wide training day for all low level managers to respond to an “invasion situation” (2014) – all of these point toward an increased “Russian scare”, as well as state-level anti-refugee propaganda, which largely used to silence dissent with the government, protests and grassroots movements. We know the situation in Lithuania is not an exception in Eastern Europe. As the military and national security budgets increases, the social systems are degrading, the labor codes are being liberalised to the extent never seen before. Anti-immigration sentiments are prevailing although people from this region are also the ones who are forced to leave and follow the capital. Tensions are growing everywhere and… to finish with a small rap: “A conclusion leads us that revolution is once again a solution!” *The Support that we are asking is*, firstly, to spread the news about the case and situation here. We are searching for international journalists who would be interested to write about the case, immigrants and refugees situation in Lithuania. Secondly, your advices and experiences of dealing with these kinds of cases would be helpful: successful actions of support that were organised, official organisations that could help, etc. Thirdly, your solidarity will be helpful in itself, as it keeps you strong, feeling more people behind your back in a court hall and in the streets At the moment financial support is not needed. In solidarity, Egzilis collective # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: