Lismore on Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:51:00 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Perhaps a way of teaching media |
These sentiments of tutelage are still comprised of hegemonic, or otherwise top-down authority. The prescence of rule-sets, although fully conscious of their attempt as dispatching the foibles of American higher education, still predicate a demand for structure. Instead :: 1. Forget your institution. We, you, my archivist, the challenging administration that rule the persistence of politics in education, have all become mutually implicated in the margin-making process of "higher" institutions. And although they promise enrichment and prowess, they do nothing more than recapitulate the Great American Debt. Its true, our young great minds are striving to break the ramifications of persuing expanded knowledge bases, but the lines between the "school" and the "corporation" have shamefully lost their definition, thus allowing for each to model the other. To foster the potential of impressionable gray matter, such as my own and my "peers," around the pastiche of popular culture is not disengaging from its hypnosis. The promise of distributed knowledge only goes as far as the classroom walls, thus feeding the informatics of domination, repopulating the vectors of knowledge. Learning peer to peer, instructor to student, is not an expanded knowledge base. Instead it is incestuous, insular, and perpetuates the formation of margins. In other words, Brown is a product (although it is not the only one), in which its goods are a heightened fear of failure, bombardment of confusion (displacing many American graduates in a type of labor-less mire of office work and information mongering), and reinforcement of academic superiority over members of the middle and lower-class. A product, indeed, one that we strive for; one of legitimation; one that bolsters the small sense of pride that we have left; one that I wish i could contain. Self-referentiality. Noise. Pity-parties. An Unconvincing hypothesis. Over generalizations. Defensiveness. Buzz-words. Nonsense. Other ragingly hypocritical critiques. With more respect than you know. L][X4 On Dec 13, 2007 1:11 PM, Alan Sondheim <sondheim@panix.com> wrote: > Perhaps a way of teaching media <...> -- L!SM0R3 # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org