t byfield on Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:47:42 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> how to fix a liquidity crisis |
Until just a few months ago, received wisdom held that the "modern" global financial system had become so complex and intertwingled that it had developed a de facto ability to absorb and dissipate almost any financial shock. And it's true in a sense; the problem is that the dissipation isn't homogeneous. So, as soon as we started hearing about arctic villages in Norway losing about half their investment in collapsing Citigroup-originated "collateralized debt obligations" and the like, the received wisdom crowd fell quiet. Now comes this, which we'll be hearing much more about, I expect. According to the 12 Dec 07 _Financial Times_ ("Bank co-ops keep US afloat," p.2, <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0a487d16-a857-11dc-9485-0000779fd2ac.html>): The latest Fed flow of funds data shows that FHLBs [Federal Home Loan Banks, "a little-known network of government-sponsored bank co-operatives founded during the Great Depression"] issued new loans at an unprecedented annualised rate of $746bn (EU508bn, UKP366bn) in the third quarter, up from practically nothing in the second quarter. FHLB loans helped depository institutions ramp up their acquisition of mortgages by almost $190bn, annualised to $312bn. This - along with record purchases of mortgages by better-known government sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac - offset a large part of the $512bn annualised decline in mortgage purchases by special investment vehicles (SIVs) conduits and other issuers of asset-backed securities at the epicentre of the crisis. As a result, US mortgage lending continued to grow right through the credit squeeze, increasing at an annualised rate of $732bn in the third quarter. "Little-known" is no exaggeration. For example, searching the NYT's 1981+ web archives for "FHLB" turns up a paltry 34 references; the most recent is from twelve years ago, 23 Jan 95, and refs 11-34 span 2 Nov 89 through 31 Jul 84. With the exception of the 2333-word 18 Oct 90 article "3 Senators Made Extreme Efforts for S&L Figure" -- Charles Keating -- "the average length of these articles was 91 words. The longer article "describes an effort involving Senator Dennis DeConcini of Arizona to "discredit the chairman of the FHLB Board: "The FHLB, under Edwin Gray, is a 'Mad Dog' turned loose in a police state effort," Mr. Keating wrote. "May I suggest a rat hole costing billions of dollars is a reason to investigate the actions and the results of FHLB policies." According to the WSJ (27 Nov 07, "Countrywide Borrowing Triggers Call for Review"): The home-loan banks were created by Congress in 1932 to prop up failing banks and provide money for housing. They borrow money through global bond issues on the strength of investors' belief that the U.S. government would rescue them in a crisis. The banks have taken on a larger-than-usual role over the past few months in providing funds for mortgages. They have stepped up their secured loans, known as advances, to mortgage lenders to fill a void created in August, when investors' fears of default shut off mortgage lenders' ability to raise money through commercial paper or other short-term borrowings. According to the FT article, the top 10 FHLB loans as of 30 Sep 07 are: "Member" Advances % of tot Citibank 98.7bn 12.0% Countrywide Bank 51.1bn 6.2% Washington Mutual Bank 43.7bn 5.3% World Savings Bank 24.2bn 2.9% RBS Citizens 21.9bn 2.7% Sovereign Bank 21.1bn 2.6% Bank of America [RI] 19.6bn 2.4% World Savings Bank (Tx) 17.3bn 2.1% Bank of America [Cal] 14.8bn 1.8% And this when UBS writing down $10B on Monday grabbed headlines. One Senator, Chuck Schumer of NY, isn't happy about it: he's accused Countrywide of "treating the [FHLB] system like its personal ATM," and is concerned about the quality of the collateral partly because many of the loans held as investments by Countrywide are so-called pay-option adjustable-rate mortgages, or option ARMs. These loans allow borrowers to make minimal payments in the early years, resulting in far-higher ones later. Apparently, he's unconcerned with Citibank taking an advance of close to $100B -- but they're one of his constituents. Interestingly, the Asia Times beat even FT to reporting this. Its 11 Dec 07 Credit Bubble Bulletin column ("Wrong Call," Doug Noland, <http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/IL11Dj02.html>) offers a jaw-dropping litany of erratic data. For example: During the third quarter, total credit market borrowings (TCMB) increased at a record seasonally- adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of US$4.989 trillion to $47.864 trillion. This was a significant acceleration from Q2's $3.811 trillion and compares to Q3 2006's $3.448 trillion. For perspective, growth in TCMB averaged $1.237 trillion annually during the nineties. For the seven years 2000 through 2006, TCMB growth averaged $2.803 trillion. Financial Sector Borrowings expanded at an unprecedented SAAR $2.321 trillion during the quarter. This compares to a $494 billion average during the nineties and the $981 billion annually during the period 2000-2006. Total credit market debt has now ballooned 20% in two years. Since the beginning of 2003, total debt has surged 50% - rising from 298% of GDP to 343% - in the greatest credit inflation in history. With Wall Street finance under heightened stress, bank assets expanded a record SAAR $1.586 trillion during the quarter, or a 16.2% rate to $10.873 trillion. To put the scope of this ballooning into perspective, recall that bank assets increased a record $897 billion during 2006, after expanding $763 billion during '05, $762 billion in '04 and $495 billion during 2003. Bank assets expanded, on average, $215 billion annually during the nineties. For the third quarter on the bank asset side, loans expanded a record SAAR $957 billion, up from Q2's $461 billion and Q3 '06's SAAR $411 billion. In nominal dollars, bank loans expanded more during Q3 ($249 billion) than they did for the entire year 2003 ($215 billion). [...] Breakneck banking system expansion was matched by (non-Wall Street-backed) structured finance. In the face of faltering marketplace liquidity, GSE assets expanded a record SAAR $617 billion, or a 20.7% rate. This compares to 2006's asset growth of $61 billion and 2005's contraction of $64 billion. GSE ballooning peaked at $344 billion during 2001. In nominal dollars, the $154 billion increase in GSE assets during Q3 surpassed even the $137 billion increase during (the infamous LTCM reliquefication from) Q4 1998. The entire GSE expansion is explained by the unprecedented SAAR $759 billion surge in Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) loans and advances. In nominal dollars, the $180 billion Q3 increase in FHLB loans and advances' amounted to a 112% growth rate, with y-o-y growth of 27.7% to $822 billion. Randall W. Forsyth, "The 'B Word' Returns: Backdoor Bailouts of Bankruptcy Candidates," Barron's notes: "FHLB obligations are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, but what do you think would ever happen to an entity with "Federal" in its name?" <http://online.barrons.com/article/SB119488478165290127.html?mod=googlenews_barrons> Oh, and the FHLB Board announced a new CEO today, effective 1 Jan 08: <http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN1259323620071212> Entirely unrelated, I'm sure. The current CEO has been their since 92. The new one, John Fisk, "will also become chief operating officer and president of the Financing Corp (FICO) and the Resolution Funding Corp (REFCORP) on Jan 1." FICO was established in 87 to finance the Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC); REFCORP was established in 1989 to bail out the S&L industry. Cheers, T # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org