nettime's digest on Thu, 6 Jun 2002 09:39:28 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Refugees in Australia [3x] |
Table of Contents: Woomera reverts to pre-UN policy on visitors Dave/Ross <ross777au@bigpond.com> Re: <nettime> Children Placed in Punishment Compound Plasma Studii <office@plasmastudii.org> Worst I've seen, says UN asylum inspector "ben moretti" <bmoretti@chariot.net.au> ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 09:08:56 +1000 From: Dave/Ross <ross777au@bigpond.com> Subject: Woomera reverts to pre-UN policy on visitors Woomera Reverts to Pre-U.N. Policy on Visitors The ACM and DIMIA staff at the Woomera Detention Centre have returned to an obstructionist approach to visitors once again, following the departure of U.N. investigators. To our knowledge, the most successful visitor in the history of the centre, Matt Damon, succeeded in getting three visits on successive days: the day of the U.N. visit, and the day before and the day after. However, the next person to ask permission to visit detainees was told that one of the two women she wanted to visit flatly refused to see her, even though the visitor had a letter from the detainee requesting a visit. The visitor then asked for permission to return to visit other detainees who had requested a visit from her, and she was told that the staff at the centre were "too busy" to be bothered with visitors until the following weekend. When a member of the ACM staff was asked how many visitors had arrived during the week to see the more than 200 people being detained there, she replied, "Only you." In other words, a centre which gets almost no requests for members of the public to visit detainees is operating on a policy of no visitors at all being allowed in during the week, on top of the usual excuses for denying access on the weekends. Requests by mail from other people have either not been answered, or they have been answered with confusing arguments and questions which appear to be aimed at finding excuses to deny access. People are asked how they managed to make contact with the detainees in the first place (and we already know that alleged associations with any of the 2,000 or so refugee advocates who attended the Easter demonstrations has been used as an excuse to deny access). In other words, if they admit that they got the names and numbers of the detainees (which are a closely guarded secret within ACM and DIMIA circles) from activists who are campaigning for refugee rights, then it may be enough to warrant them being barred from visiting, as is the case with the Refugee Embassy staff based in Woomera, who would like to visit detainees on a full-time basis. (Connections with the Refugee Embassy must also be hidden, which is why this report is not being too specific about the sources of information used in preparing it.) People who list more than one or two people that they would like to visit are treated with suspicion. And those who wish to return the next day to see the same people get a similar grilling about why they should need more than the one visit. If you forget a name or mispronounce it, this is given as evidence that you must not really know the person you are visiting. And the staff all insist that this is being done to "protect the rights of the detainees". This, in spite of the fact that more than seventy detainees have filled out forms stating that they would like a visit from ANYONE who will make the effort to travel to Woomera to see them. This policy of obstructing visits from friendly Australians is one of the cruellest tricks of the Ruddock-Howard administration, in their efforts to keep the public from seeing the human face of the detainees, and to keep the detainees from receiving any hope or encouragement from Australians. It is no wonder that angry Australians would think of tearing down fences, and desperate detainees would risk their lives to escape, when legal visits (something freely available to the worst criminals in Australia) are blocked consistently, week after week and year after year. Most detainees at Woomera have never received a single visit from a friendly Australian, apart from their lawyers. Something must be done about this. Dave McKay Refugee Embassy Woomera Phone: 0407-238805 - -- for the moment, mail to fold@idl.net.au will be automatically forwarded to ross777au@bigpond.com, so you may reply to either address and it will reach me. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 15:22:56 -0400 From: Plasma Studii <office@plasmastudii.org> Subject: Re: <nettime> Children Placed in Punishment Compound >Children Placed in Punishment Compound If they took the children away from the mothers that were going to be punished, would that make anyone any happier? >The much vaunted program to put refugee women and children into >community housing in the township of Woomera is suffering from a >philosophy of punitive action byACM staff, according to a report from >the Refugee Embassy at Woomera. > >Women and children who misbehave while living in the township are not >only being returned to imprisonment behind razor wire, [ ... ] If you had to isolate some "misbehaver" from the rest of a refugee camp would you put them up in a hotel? >but in some >cases, they are even being placed in the dreaded Oscar Compound, >which is used as a punishment area for the most troublesome >prisoners Like the "misbehavers" that do something that deserves imprisonment? Sounds like a case of just looking for some issue to get outraged about. Which would be harmless by itself. but has the effect that if there really is a greater issue (evil prison system), the decision makers will have this protest to site as proof that they are justified because this opposition is so trivial and misdirected. judson ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PLASMA STUDII http://plasmastudii.org 223 E 10th Street PMB 130 New York, NY 10003 ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 09:08:14 +0950 From: "ben moretti" <bmoretti@chariot.net.au> Subject: Worst I've seen, says UN asylum inspector [What, so the Government spruce up of the detention centre *didn't* fool the UN inspectors? I mean they probably spent a couple of thousand dollars putting in lovely trees and murals of happy refugees, they even built them a children's playground. It is no wonder that the ruling Coalition government wants to block moves for Australia to ratify a convention for the establishment of an International Court - they would probably be up on charges within a year or two. Ben] http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/06/05/1022982721514.html Worst I've seen, says UN asylum inspector By Michael Millett June 6 2002 The United Nations has expressed its disgust at Australia's mandatory detention system, describing the Howard Government's policy of locking up asylum seekers for long periods as a gross abuse of human rights. The stinging condemnation came yesterday from the head of a special UN delegation during private talks with two senior Government ministers. The Herald has learnt that the head of the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Louis Joinet, warned the Government he would declare his objections at a press conference today. It is understood that Mr Joinet privately told welfare groups he had not seen a more gross abuse of human rights in more than 40 inspections of mandatory detention facilities around the world. The UN's dismay was conveyed in separate meetings with the Immigration Minister, Philip Ruddock, and the Foreign Minister, Alexander Downer. Today's public condemnation will be a severe embarrassment for the Government, given its repeated assurances that its treatment of asylum cases - notably its rigid adherence to a policy of mandatory detention - does not breach international standards. Mr Ruddock has touted the system as a model for other countries to follow in dealing with mass people movements. This week he told Parliament that a number of European countries, including Britain, had begun implementing elements of the Australian approach. But Mr Ruddock has been in conflict with the judiciary over his handling of immigration, and the detention system was criticised by another UN representative, Justice Prafullachandra Bhagwati, in private talks with the Government last week. The judge, an envoy for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mary Robinson, and Mr Joinet's team have just finished inspecting a number of detention centres. The tours - tightly orchestrated by the Government amid accusations that millions of dollars were spent sprucing up the centres - included visits to Port Hedland, Woomera and Villawood. The UN inspectors spent several hours interviewing detainees about camp conditions. Mr Joinet's meeting with Mr Downer was delayed until late last night, giving the Government little time to prepare for the political fallout. But Mr Downer told Mr Joinet the mandatory detention policy was deemed to be very successful and there was "no reason to modify it". The Government had been bracing for an adverse finding since it gave grudging acceptance earlier this year to the inspections. The visitors' findings bring the Government into direct confrontation with the UN. But the mandatory detention policy has strong public support. While Labor is split over the issue, the Opposition Leader, Simon Crean, has vowed to retain mandatory detention. - -- ben moretti mailto:bmoretti@chariot.net.au http://www.chariot.net.au/~bmoretti __o _`\<,_ (*)/ (*) ------------------------------ # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net