integer on Sun, 23 Sep 2001 07:12:47 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] [ot] [!nt] \n2+0\ |
apropoz amer!kan pedagog!e] (4warded: a letter from a former president of the bank of botswana) Subject: Ground Zero Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 06:31:09 +0200 Dearest Di, Tim and Kath, Thank you so much for your observations and insights, telephonic and via email. They have brought the whole frightful affair into vivid perspective. I have spent much of the past week, when not glued to the TV (day and night), trying to think through the possible causes and implications of what happened. The latter are easier to comprehend than the former. The economic implications are certainly crowding in on us faster than I thought they would. There is now no doubt that there will be a serious global recession. Unemployment in the major economies will be significantly higher than the most pessimistic analysts predicted. Third World countries will feel the pain no less than the industrialised countries. Global economic integration will be difficult to defend. All that seems quite evident. Distant as Botswana is, in terms of space and economic linkages, we felt the impact immediately. Air Botswana had to fly plane loads of tourists, returning home after holidays in the Okavango and Chobe, back to Gaborone from Johannesburg and accommodate them here after their intercontinental flights were cancelled. Debswana quickly announced plans to scale back diamond production. Botswana's foreign exchange reserves, mainly in US$ or $-linked investment instruments, took a knock. That means that the Bank of Botswana's profits this year and next will be well below the figures forecast, which will mean, in turn, less revenue to the Government and therefore lower levels of economic activity in the years ahead. At the micro-level, these developments are being cited by corporations and individuals as a justification for not joining Transparency International Botswana (TIBOT) at a time when I am trying to recruit members to help combat corruption in Botswana. The ripples go on and on. The amount of damage which a handful of fanatic suicide hijackers can inflict on this closely knit world we live in is beyond comprehension. How and why did it happen? We now have two lively FM radio stations in Gaborone, one the brainchild of Solly Monyame who regards Tim as his role model and went to Thornhill with Jen and Tess. Solly conducts an early morning call-in radio talk show. The topic this past week has been terrorism and the terrorist attacks in the US. The views expressed by callers seemed to me to reflect the dichotomy of public opinion. About half the callers grieved with America and recalled all the benefits which Botswana gained from US involvement here: Peace Corps, capital investment, aid. They spoke of their fondness for Americans and, in the case of Batswana who had studied in the US, their admiration for America. There were lots of flowers outside the US Embassy here. The other half were less sympathetic. They pointed out that the US Government had sided with and assisted virtually every undemocratic, racist and oppressive regime and corrupt dictator which the world has known in the past century, from apartheid South Africa, to Selassie, Tubman, Mobutu, Savimbi and Moi in Africa, and has taken the wrong side in most national and regional conflicts (e.g. Viet Nam, Iran, Korea, China (initially), the Middle East, Cuba, etc). The obsession with communism was clearly a major factor in many of these alignments. (Ironic to discover that Bin Laden was himself recruited and trained to fight Russia!) America's unconditional support for Israel was considered by many to be a tragic mistake. It has also been striking to hear the word 'arrogant' used so often in Botswana, as it has in CNN's many interviews, to describe Americans. All the Americans I know are the opposite of arrogant: warm, friendly, personable, egalitarian. But, watching CNN, one couldn't help noting, once again, how often the American leadership seems to find it necessary to describe America as the 'greatest country on earth' or 'in the history of mankind' or 'in the civilised world'. Don't they stop to think how the Japanese, Chinese, Indians, Arabs, Germans, Russians, French and Brits might feel about that that? Several local callers in Gaborone made the point that being the greatest country in the world has not caused the US to honour its financial obligations to the UN, replenish IDA, or sign global warming treaties. Economic size, technological advancement and military might does not equate to 'greatness' or 'civilisation', they say. I agree with them. To explain what has happened solely in terms of the chest-thumping behaviour of American leaders is clearly ridiculous. There are so many other factors involved, some global, others particularistic. Perhaps it is too early to try to draw conclusions - the human tragedy is too immediate - but it will be important, as America and the rest of the world grapples with the aftermath of the recent hijackings, to consider what needs to be changed if further tragedies of this kind are to be averted. Perhaps it is naive to expect that there will ever be any protection from small bands of totally committed, disciplined, suicidal terrorists? One thing that has heartened me, as I mentioned in an earlier email, is to observe two common reactions among so many young people in the US. The first is their willingness to reach out and help others, to make personal sacrifices. The other was their recognition of the importance of becoming involved in the world, not retreating into fortress America and surrounding themselves with hi-tec gadgets and suburban comfort. The anger of the people who tried to disrupt the WTO and IMF/World Bank meetings was terribly manipulated and misplaced, in my view, but at least it showed concern for such phenomena as poverty, environmental degradation, cultural diversity, global warming, and international corruption. Perhaps the recent obscene acts of terrorism will make everyone understand that what happens in Afghanistan or in the minds of religious zealots can affect us all. I hope that I live to see the day when Cailan and Zorabel and Dale and ? are not embarrassed to say that they, like their aunt and uncle, want to save the world - and do something about it. One last observation. I couldn't agree more with Di's view of shrub. (Why do you call him shrub with a capital s?) Leaving aside the shenanigans in Florida, how could 'the greatest nation in the world' elect such an uninformed, insensitive and inarticulate man to be its President? His sentences usually comprise five or six words only. But when he attempts a slightly more complex statement and gets half way through it - usually marked with ers and ums - one wonders if he has any idea how to conclude it. Often he doesn't! What a joy to listen to Colin Powell. On the other hand, the street interviews conducted by CNN and the other international networks revealed that most Americans, especially the younger ones, are scarcely more articulate than shrub. (Perhaps that's why he won?) I have never heard so many 'likes' and 'rights' and 'y'knows' and 'y'sees'. One very brave young woman, whose interview was shown several times on CNN, managed to cram 14 'likes' into one sentence. I counted. How's that for efficient communication? Enough pontification. Keep the emails and telephone calls coming. I am copying this to the exemplary Eleys in London and the lovely Lambkins in Rome to confirm that I have obtained the necessary sponsorship and visas to attend the 10th International Anti-Corruption Conference in Prague in early October and look forward to seeing them en route. I will send further emails to them giving flight details. Much love to you all, Quill _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold