John Armitage on Wed, 12 Sep 2001 12:42:39 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] The Media: As an Attack Unfolds, a Struggle to Provide Vivid Imag es to Homes |
THE NEW YORK TIMES SEP 12, 2001 http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/12/national/12MEDI.html?pagewanted=print The Media: As an Attack Unfolds, a Struggle to Provide Vivid Images to Homes By FELICITY BARRINGER and GERALDINE FABRIKANT Television's broadcast networks and many of its cable channels - both news and entertainment - scrapped their regular schedules yesterday. Radio stations took live television news feeds. Two dozen newspapers published special editions and Web sites threw out their advertising and in some cases stripped down to basic text and still images to help their overtaxed computers handle a demand for news unlike any they had experienced. Between the moment when perplexed morning news broadcasters began fielding calls from Greenwich Village residents who saw a low- flying plane crash into One World Trade Center and the moment more than an hour later when New York's twin towers crumbled into Roman candles of smoky debris, the country's media outlets geared up to become the public stage of a national emergency. By noon, all four major television networks had agreed to share video images. By midafternoon, almost all of AOL Time Warner's cable channels, like TBS and TNT, were carrying CNN; Viacom's CBS News feed was being carried by Viacom's music channels, VH1 and MTV; and Peter Jennings of ABC News was appearing not just on his network, but on Disney's ESPN channel and all ABC radio stations. Most of the networks used variations of the title adopted by CNN: America Under Attack. Images of billowing smoke from lower Manhattan and the low, smoldering profile of the Pentagon, hit, like the Trade Center towers, by a hijacked commercial jetliner, were dominant on all networks. Referring to the unusual agreement to share images among the bitterly competitive news divisions of the networks and CNN, the Fox News president, Roger Ailes, said: "All the networks decided that this is a national emergency. We're not keeping score today." Nor were they making much money, as they largely scrapped commercial advertising. In Washington, where the downtown had become a ghost town after the federal government was shut down, delivery trucks for The Washington Post headed for suburban 7- Eleven stores carrying a special edition dominated by a two-inch headline, "Terror Hits Pentagon, World Trade Center," with a lead editorial headlined "War." Special editions were also published by The Los Angeles Times, The Chicago Tribune, The Newark Star-Ledger, The Charlotte Observer in North Carolina, The Austin American-Statesman in Texas, not to mention small dailies like The LaCrosse Tribune in Wisconsin. Traffic at news Web sites soared, with 10 times or more the usual number of users trying to log on, clogging the Internet and slowing response time. Because New York was not just ground zero of the opening attack but also the heartland of the media industry, some of the most dramatic early accounts were from correspondents working at or near their homes. Don Dahler, an ABC News correspondent who covered recent civil wars in Africa, was getting dressed for work in his third-floor apartment in Tribeca, perhaps half a mile from the World Trade Center, when he heard the first plane hit. "I heard what is a very familiar sound anywhere else in the world, in war zones," Mr. Dahler said. "It sounded to me like a missile, a high- pitched scream and a roar followed by an explosion, my mind was telling me it's a missile. Then I saw this gaping wound in the World Trade Center. I called into `Good Morning' immediately and started reporting," standing on his sixth-floor rooftop with a cellular telephone. Mr. Dahler, just one of the network's sources, was not on the air when he felt the first of the two towers collapse. "When it collapsed I could feel a rumble, and I tried to interrupt to say that something was happening right before my eyes," he said. "The building collapsed. I was telling them it looks like its coming down, it looks like it's coming down. They switched to me right after it had fallen." If there were a few stutter-steps like that, it was not surprising. It was one of the rare instances when television brought disaster into American homes in real time. The radical changes in the technology of news delivery, however, along with the quality of video imagery gave most of the day's news broadcasts the feeling of an epic disaster movie. The only genuinely grainy imagery came from the most advanced and portable equipment: CNN's satellite video phones, which allowed that network alone to televise a news conference with the spiritual leader of the Taliban government in Afghanistan, the country that harbors the headquarters of the accused terrorist, Osama Bin Laden. By evening, the same equipment was showing tracer fire and explosions in Kabul. Beyond the vivid pictures, the reporting included a number of mistakes borne of rumors that sprang up throughout the day. CNN reported that another plane was headed for the Pentagon. Fox News reported that the State Department was on fire. CBS News reported that a second airplane tried to attack the Pentagon. All the reports were later corrected. The closest major news organization to the scene was The Wall Street Journal, whose main offices nearby were evacuated at 9:15 a.m. Reporters and editors worked from home or other Dow Jones offices from New Jersey to Hong Kong to prepare a Wednesday issue. Talk radio shows, which sometimes feed on inflammatory commentary, were unusually low key yesterday, with hosts sympathizing or eliciting information from eyewitnesses rather than goading. On the New York radio dial, reporters at news stations struggled to describe the breadth of the destruction. And talk radio hosts - sometimes after ominous music played in the background - covered subjects from airport security to retaliation. The radio reports played a larger role than usual in bringing news to the city, since the antennas that broadcast the signals of WABC and WNBC were destroyed along with the twin towers. New Yorkers without cable television - about 30 percent to 35 percent of the city's viewers - could only get WCBS, whose antenna is on the Empire State Building. The radio journalists reverted to the techniques of Edward R. Murrow's wartime broadcasts from London to make the story visual. On WCBS-AM, the journalist Peter Haskell reported that ambulances were lined up "as far as the eye can see on both sides of the West Side Highway." On WINS, the reporter Steve Kastenbaum said: "It looks like the entire city is just walking home. The Brooklyn Bridge is a sea of people coming off the F.D.R. Drive, walking down from Midtown, walking across the East River to their destinations." Elsewhere in the country, some stations used the event to set up a dialogue with listeners. A Christian radio station in Los Angeles, KFSG- FM, canceled commercial advertising yesterday until 6 p.m. and used its afternoon hours to take calls from listeners who wanted to talk about the attacks. _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold